Private Market Investing Events
The Best Private Market Investing Events Guide for 2026 Discover top private market investing events. From venture capital to real…
Is Helium Running Out?
Is helium running out? As long as natural gas deposits containing helium are managed properly, supply shortages are unlikely .
Helium, Gas & Geopolitics: Crisis, Disruption, and Realignment
The 2026 Gulf War has fundamentally altered helium supply dynamics. LSC's 50-page analysis is now available for professional investors.
Helium Gas Industry Outlook - Soaring Supply Secured
Geopolitical shifts away from gas pipelines and coal energy, favoured methane gas monetisation via LNG, which enables increased helium extraction.
As long as natural gas deposits with helium are appropriately managed, there is little likelihood for helium shortages to occur in the short term due to geologic constraints.
Is Helium Running Out? The Political Economy of a Critical Commodity
Consider helium – a gas so light it escapes every container, much like elusive truths that shape our understanding. Comedian Dara Ó Briain tells a story of a man whose childhood misadventure – losing his ice cream in the sand – was soothed by his father with a special helium balloon, unknowingly contributing to a supposed helium supply induced medical imaging crisis decades later. By highlighting fears of restricted or prohibited future access to critical medical technology, the anecdote underscores public misconceptions surrounding recent helium shortages.
Today, if you’ve heard the alarms about helium shortages, you might imagine we’re down to the dregs, with MRI scanners and semiconductor plants scrambling for scraps. Yes, helium is finite, but “finite” doesn’t mean an imminent crisis, as reserves currently cover centuries of demand at current usage rates.
In 2024, the helium market’s fragility was theoretical. In March 2026, it became operational.
The 2026 Gulf War: What Changed and What Didn't
The first quarter of 2026 exposed the helium market’s structural fragility in a way no previous disruption had. Iranian strikes on Qatar’s Ras Laffan industrial complex on 18-19 March, combined with the US naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz declared on 12 April, simultaneously damaged the world’s largest helium facility and immobilised the logistics chain through which 25-30% of global supply reaches market.
Understanding what this crisis means for investors requires separating two distinct disruptions that carry very different timelines.
The structural damage to LNG Trains 4 and 6 at Ras Laffan has taken approximately 309 MMcf/year of helium export capacity offline for 3-5 years (our base case places full restoration at 2029-2030). This represents roughly 14% of Qatar’s exports and 4-5% of global supply. It is real and multi-year.
The logistics freeze from the US naval blockade temporarily immobilises the remaining 86% of Qatar’s undamaged capacity, because no vessels can exit the Gulf. Approximately 200 cryogenic ISO containers stranded at Hamad Port have now exceeded their 35-45 day shelf life; their helium content is unrecoverable.
What the crisis did not change is the fundamental supply picture. The pre-crisis market was in structural oversupply (2025 demand ~6.0 Bcf, supply ~6.5 Bcf). New capacity: Russia’s Amur GPP Line 2 (700 MMcf/year), Qatar’s own NFE Helium-4 and -5, and Algeria’s Skikda restart, more than compensates for the structural train damage. The market does not face a resource scarcity problem.
The investment-relevant mechanism is long-term contract repricing at re-opener windows (years 3 and 5). Most contracts signed 2022-2026 will not reach their first re-opener until 2027-2031. Pre-crisis contract prices in 4Q 2025 were approximately $93,940-96,440 per metric tonne, trending downward. The crisis has reversed that direction in the near term. Whether re-opener prices settle 30-50% above pre-crisis levels depends on three variables: the speed of Russia’s Amur GPP ramp-up, the time before the Strait reopens, and the pace of semiconductor helium recycling deployment.
The semiconductor recovery. Semiconductor manufacturers (the largest and fastest-growing helium consumer at 21-25% of global demand) are permanently changing their demand profile. Samsung’s March 2026 announcement of full-scale deployment of its Helium Recycling System across all fabs — targeting >90% recovery from a current fleet rate of 19.1% – is a significant demand-destruction event. TSMC’s existing 65-70% fleet-wide recovery rate is the benchmark the sector is converging toward. As it does, semiconductor helium demand growth of 6-7% CAGR will materially be influenced. LSC’s total demand growth estimate remains 1-3% CAGR. The crisis has accelerated the technology substitution that would have compressed demand over a longer horizon.
The global helium market is bifurcating. Russia’s Amur GPP sells into Asia at ~$64.5/kg. Western industrial gas majors (Air Products, Linde, Air Liquide) retain pricing power with European, Japanese, and US buyers. EU sanctions (14th package, June 2024) ban Russian helium transshipment via EU ports. The two-tier market that was forming before March 2026 is now structural.
Full supply/demand analysis, company-level exposure tables, and post-crisis recovery scenarios are available in LSC’s 52-page research report.
The Critical Minerals Conundrum
Helium provides a fascinating historical lens into the dynamics of “critical materials”. Once the first mineral declared “critical” due to its indispensable role in wartime and scientific progress, helium’s status has changed dramatically. In 2023, helium was removed from the DoE’s critical minerals list.
The U.S. Energy Act of 2020 defines “critical materials” to be: (A) Any non-fuel mineral, element, substance, or material that the Secretary of Energy determines (i) has high risk for supply chain disruption; and (ii) serves an essential function in one or more energy technologies. This shift aligns with changing demand patterns: in 1947, nearly 90% of helium was consumed directly in military airships, while today, less than 7% is used for lifting purposes. Helium is indirectly used in manufacturing processes but does not contribute to the physical composition of components or final products.
This raises pressing questions: What distinguishes the policies that once safeguarded helium from today’s broader critical mineral strategies? As global demand shifts and previously uneconomic reserves become viable, have helium prices peaked? And how will recent helium deposit discoveries and increased LNG distribution of natural gas production shape helium’s future criticality? Is helium running out?
Understanding Helium: Properties and Significance
Helium Formation
Helium is primarily generated as a byproduct of the radioactive decay of elements such as uranium and thorium, typically found in granite rocks. This decay process occurs at an incredibly slow rate, with half-lives ranging from hundreds of thousands to millions of years. The estimated annual production of helium is only about 5,000 tonnes, making it a non-renewable resource on a human timescale.
However, earth’s 3.8 billion years of geological history have allowed significant quantities of helium to be generated.
The release of helium from these rocks requires heating or tectonic activity. Once liberated, helium migrates upward and, like other gases, escapes into the atmosphere. However, under specific geological conditions, radiogenic helium can be captured underground along with other natural gases.
This occurs when porous reservoir rocks, acting as natural storage, are capped by impermeable layers, preventing the escape of the gases. Over billions of years, such reservoirs can accumulate significant quantities of helium, often mixed with other gases like nitrogen, carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and even hydrocarbons, such as methane. The widespread discovery of methane in geological formations globally underscores how prevalent effective geological traps are.
These traps not only preserve methane but are also critical for accumulating helium. Earth’s extensive geological history has facilitated the preservation of substantial helium reserves in economically viable quantities. While most helium atoms extracted to date have been found in natural gas reservoirs, where they are recovered as a byproduct of methane gas production, new exploration is now increasingly focused on discovering helium for its own sake or in conjunction with geological “white” hydrogen.
Natural Gas and Helium Production
The cryogenic extraction of methane for liquefied natural gas (LNG) shipping can significantly affect the economics of helium extraction. Commercially, helium concentrations as low as 0.04% can be viable, provided large LNG infrastructure is in place.
Whereas before, non-hydrocarbon-focused extraction required higher helium content, currently concentrations above 2% are considered economic under current price conditions.
Alarmingly, about 50% of globally produced helium goes unrecovered, often flared or vented alongside other undesirable elements in natural gas. This highlights the need for stronger regulations on natural gas emissions, as methane emissions not only pose environmental risks but also impact helium resources. The inefficiencies in helium recovery raise concerns about the sustainability of natural gas production, underscoring the importance of effective methane emission regulations, which directly affect the criticality of helium.
Global Helium Resources
The United States Geological Survey (USGS) estimated global helium resources in 2020 at 51.9 billion cubic meters (BCM), with the U.S. (20.6 BCM), Qatar (10.1 BCM), Algeria (8.2 BCM), and Russia (6.8 BCM) holding approximately 88% of identified global reserves. Several countries not acknowledged by the USGS, like Iran, also holds material helium resources.
Our table combine USGS data (the last published USGS estimate in 2020), and our estimates of overall resources using in-country analysis.
Current resource estimates suggest that global helium reserves are plentiful, with sufficient resources to meet over 260 years of demand.
If helium is truly deemed critical, the amount lost via natural gas production might calls for stricter regulations on methane emissions and stronger enforcement of recycling programs to preserve this valuable resource. Studies found that as long as natural gas deposits with helium are appropriately managed, there is little likelihood for helium supply shortages to occur in the medium term due to geologic constraints.
Price Discovery in an Unregulated Pricing Market
Initially, U.S. government agencies controlled the extraction, purification, storage, and pricing of helium, effectively monopolising the market and keeping prices low. However, since the early 2000s, helium pricing has shifted significantly with the reduction of government control and a transition towards improved price recovery, ultimately leading to a more market-driven approach.
The end of U.S. government supply, combined with the increasing concentration of the helium distribution market, has driven prices upward. From the early 2000s to 2023, uncontracted liquid helium prices have risen by an average of 7.9% per year, disproportionately affecting small, non-contracted buyers.
This price increase is partly due to supply chain disruptions and technical shortages. However, the primary driver has been the concentration of the helium supply chain in the hands of a few large distributors. As the distribution market has become more centralized, prices for uncontracted helium have increased as a result of less competition and tighter control over supply. For example, while the price of private industry’s Grade-A liquid helium was estimated at about $14 per cubic meter ($390 per thousand cubic feet) in 2023, contracted upstream producers, who sell to integrated distributors under long-term contracts, have not seen similar gains from these price increases.
In short, although the market has experienced significant price movements, much of this increase has not translated to higher revenues for helium well operators or upstream producers, who remain bound by lower, pre-established contract prices. The greater concentration of distribution, combined with the limited availability of uncontracted helium, has further driven up prices for consumers outside of long-term agreements, highlighting the disconnect between upstream pricing and end-market costs.
Is Helium Running Out? Or do we merely have a Fragile Supply Chain?
Since the early 2000s, major supply disruptions have been triggered by several significant events: plant failures due to mercury corrosion in Algeria, brief embargoes on helium exports from Qatar following politically driven announcements of gas production expansions, unscheduled maintenance at ExxonMobil facilities, a five-month-long shutdown in early 2022 of the Cliffside crude helium enrichment plant – that followed an extended outage in 2021 – and more recently, explosions at start-up helium plants in Russia in early 2023.
While these incidents fuelled concerns about helium scarcity, known global helium resources remain more abundant than those of most other critical minerals. However, they and wasteful gas emission practices do underscore the need for a more resilient helium supply chain.
Globally, helium demand is estimated at around 6 billion cubic feet (Bcf) annually. Due to helium’s low density and gas-to-liquid ratio of 750:1, it’s transported more efficiently in liquid form (a thermodynamic characteristic it shares with hydrogen), though this cryogenic process requires significant infrastructure investments and operational costs. Pairing helium facilities with methane processing plants can help, as these facilities have already incurred much of the capital costs needed to extract other gases from their product streams.
Currently, nearly every molecule of helium is contracted, leaving little room for spot purchases. Moreover, almost every extracted molecule of helium is already in the fleet of cryogenic storage tanks used to distribute liquid helium. This limited supply flexibility means that disruptions — whether due to geopolitical tensions, natural disasters, or maintenance shutdowns — can have a significant impact on availability.
Expanding flexibility in production, storage, and distribution is challenging, given the limited cryogenic storage capacity and tightly controlled nature of the helium market. This structural rigidity makes the market vulnerable to future shocks, such as geopolitical unrest or natural disasters. But it’s important to note that this does not mean helium is running out — rather, it highlights the need for improved supply chain resilience.
Revenue Impacts
In the helium market, significant price disparities across product types and contract durations have complex implications for revenue projections. Liquid helium, which accounts for around 40% of current sales, commands significantly higher prices than crude or gaseous helium. However, the primary beneficiaries of these higher liquid helium prices are downstream distributors rather than natural gas extraction companies. Helium suppliers generally enter into long-term contracted forward sales or offtake agreements – to derisk high capital costs – stabilising their revenue but not capturing the premium prices seen in retail-level sales to specialised sectors like NASA or scientific research institutions.
While higher prices can stimulate new investments in helium extraction, they also carry the risk of demand destruction. As prices rise, some industries may seek lower-priced alternatives or reduce consumption. Independent helium extraction investments are growing in response, but alongside these, large-scale LNG expansion projects, often focused on hydrocarbon gas, are accelerating. This influx of new helium supply could drive prices down if these new sources are allowed to compete freely in the market.
Additionally, high logistical costs play a crucial role, particularly for inland facilities spurred by semiconductor manufacturing investments under the CHIPs Act. These inland facilities are often geographically isolated from global supply routes, which insulates them from international price fluctuations. As a result, the helium supply costs for these facilities are less influenced by global market conditions, creating a disconnect between global price trends and local pricing dynamics. This has significant implications for revenue and pricing projections within financial markets.
Proportionate Consumption of Helium
The high capital costs associated with helium production mean that historically only natural gas deposits with significant helium content—greater than 3 Bcf—were considered economically viable for liquefaction plants. However, new modular supply technology that don’t convert helium into a liquid (prevalent all over Canada for example), has changed the economics of extraction. Furthermore, LNG plants provide a cost advantage by enabling helium extraction from gas with lower helium content (around 0.04% or more) thus broadening potential supply sources.
Investment Focus
Little Square Capital’s demand forecast of 1-3% CAGR for helium was published in our June 2024 analysis and remains unchanged following the 2026 Gulf crisis. It sits materially below industry consensus of 5.7%, and the 2026 crisis has reinforced rather than undermined the basis for that lower estimate.
The three variables that will govern price trajectory through the current cycle are:
Supply normalisation speed. Undamaged Qatari capacity (~86% of pre-crisis exports) can resume once the Strait reopens, subject to a 3–6 month logistical backlog. Russia’s Amur GPP Line 2 (700 MMcf/year, targeted for 2H 2026) is the most significant near-term supply addition. Algeria’s Skikda has restarted. New US capacity is online. The supply deficit is logistical and temporary, not geological and permanent.
Semiconductor recycling deployment. Samsung’s targeting of >90% helium recovery (from 19.1% current) and SK Hynix’s review of its 15-20% rate are the most consequential demand-side developments. If the sector converges toward TSMC’s 65-70% fleet-wide rate over a 5-7 year horizon, semiconductor helium demand growth will materially contract. Capital allocation toward recycling infrastructure has been accelerated relative to the pre-crisis trajectory.
Contract re-opener timing. Spot prices are elevated but represent only 2-4% of the market. The investment-relevant mechanism is long-term contract repricing at re-opener windows (years 3 and 5). Most contracts signed 2022-2026 will not reach their first re-opener until 2027-2031. Holders of long-term supply contracts with undamaged production – Air Products, Linde, Air Liquide, through their cavern storage programmes – hold the clearest near-term pricing power.
For a complete supply model, demand analysis by sector, semiconductor manufacturer disclosure tables, and company-level investment implications, see LSC’s May 2026 research report.
Is Helium Running Out? : Helium Supply
Historically, the traded gas market has been relatively small compared to the crude oil market. Most gas trade was conducted through long-term supply contracts that ensured stable pricing. The European gas market was liberalised in 2018, following efforts by the EU competition commission to increase competition.
Russia’s decision to protect its market share against U.S. and Qatari LNG imports contributed to declining European gas prices prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The completion of the Nordstream 2 pipeline in 2021 was anticipated to enhance chemical competitiveness in Europe, but geopolitical tensions stemming from the Russian invasion of Ukraine have shifted the focus toward alternative sources of gas and helium.
The EU’s plans to reduce reliance on Russian gas by 2027 have spurred investments in LNG facilities across the U.S., Canada, and Qatar, which are expected to significantly increase helium supply in the coming years.
Some new producers are even able to promote and find funding for their predominantly carbon dioxide containing helium supply from investors that exclude fossil fuels from their investment strategies – despite the questionable benefits of using unprocessed carbon dioxide in enhanced oil recovery. Supply growth is increasing!
Demand and Supply Outlook: Are U.S. Exports Justified?
When helium was first declared a critical resource, the U.S. Senate took extraordinary measures to protect it, even going so far as to block helium exports—an unique move for any critical material. These protections underscored helium’s early strategic importance. However, demand shifted. In 1947, military airships consumed nearly 90% of global helium, while today, lifting purposes account for less than 7%. Is further demand shifts rendering helium less critical?
While demand growth in medical imaging is slowing due to the advent of low-helium MRI machines, demand remains strong in sectors such as aeronautics and semiconductor production.
Yet, these industries are also beginning to feel the strain of ever-increasing costs, prompting changes in consumption patterns.
Despite perceptions of scarcity in the U.S., the country continues to be a major exporter of helium. The removal of helium from the critical minerals list aligns with US policy to privatise its helium reserves. A reverse of this policy — protecting and subsidising critical minerals domestically while simultaneously allowing exports — would raise a glaring contradiction.
If helium is truly critical, why are U.S. policymakers facilitating its export at the same time they secure taxpayer-funded subsidies? It’s clear that the current approach is less about protecting national interests and more about allowing private companies to profit from both public funds and international markets, with no real accountability to secure helium for domestic needs.
If helium is truly running out, shouldn’t the U.S. focus on safeguarding its domestic supply first, instead of sending it abroad to fuel the interests of a few large distributors? This policy not only contradicts the “critical” designation but undermines the public interest.
Uncertainty remains a key factor in demand forecasts, influenced by fluctuating market dynamics and geopolitical challenges. But the anticipated international helium supply growth to 2030 is massive. Even optimistic growth projections, predicting increases of over 6% annually, may not be enough to balance supply and demand in the coming years. Setting the scene for lower prices and higher U.S. exports of this critical resource.
Conclusion - Helium is not running out
The helium market embodies a paradox: while the world’s helium reserves are abundant, its cryogenic supply chain remains fragile, pricing opaque, and intended policies deeply inconsistent. Helium is a test case for rethinking critical minerals. The price development story of helium is less about actual scarcity, but rather about price liberalisation, concentration of global distribution, and fragile supply chains. Meanwhile, upstream producers, locked into long-term contracts to secure capital for extraction facilities, see little benefit from rising spot prices. High prices for end consumers are disproportionately impacting smaller buyers and restricting innovation.
U.S. critical minerals policy exposes a troubling hypocrisy. Labelling raw materials as a “critical resource” while exporting it to global markets, and not regulating helium containing methane emissions, contradicts the very premise of safeguarding national interests. Critical resources’ future will be defined not by geological availability but by the willingness — or lack thereof — of stakeholders to address inefficiencies, reduce waste, improve recycling, and prioritise sustainable practices. Declaring helium non-critical may be one of the few decisions in Washington not subject to helium-induced lightheadedness.
Whether essential raw material resources used in critical technologies – or even those in energy transitions – becomes a symbol of effective global collaboration or an enduring case study in global mismanagement depends on the courage to challenge entrenched interests and rethink the rules of the game. For investors, policymakers, and consumers alike, understanding the realities of helium supply is crucial to dispelling myths and ensuring informed decisions about its future use and management.
The 2026 Gulf crisis has not changed the geological reality; helium resources sustain centuries of production at current rates. It has confirmed what LSC’s 2024 analysis concluded: the market’s vulnerability is logistical and geopolitical, not geological. The Strait of Hormuz is now permanently priced as a geopolitical risk. The semiconductor industry has permanently accelerated its recycling trajectory. The Western and Russian-Asian supply chains are now bifurcated. These three structural shifts are irreversible regardless of when the current conflict resolves.
Frequently Asked Questions
While helium is a finite resource, it is not running out anytime soon. Current reserves and production rates suggest that, while limited, helium will continue to be available for several decades. However, sustainable management and responsible usage are crucial to avoid potential shortages in the future.
While alternatives like hydrogen, argon, and nitrogen can serve as substitutes for helium in some applications, there is no direct replacement for helium in critical uses such as ultra low cryogenics and specialised scientific fields. In the medical imaging industry, advancements have led to low- and even zero-helium MRI systems, which will gradually reduce reliance on helium in this sector well before known resources are depleted.
The perception of a helium shortage stems from supply chain disruptions, geopolitical factors, and the depletion of older helium production facilities, such as the U.S. National Helium Reserve. The issue is not an actual lack of helium in the Earth's crust, but rather the concentration of production and nature of storage. Over 98% of helium sales are tied up in long-term contracts, creating limited flexibility in the market. Additionally, sanctions on alternative suppliers, such as Russia, further constrain the supply chain. Furthermore, helium's low density means there are limited buffer resources, with much of the available supply tied up in cryogenic extraction and distribution infrastructure. These factors combine to amplify any disruptions, intensifying the perception of a shortage.
Estimates suggest that current global helium reserves could last over 260 years, depending on consumption rates and the development of new extraction techniques. However, ongoing conservation efforts, price-elastic thrifting and recycling technologies will play a key role in extending helium's availability.
Yes, helium can be recycled, particularly in industries that use large amounts, such as medical and scientific fields. The process helps reduce the strain on natural helium reserves and ensures that helium can continue to be used effectively without depleting supplies too quickly.
Companies are investing in alternative extraction methods to enhance recovery from natural gas fields, particularly those with lower helium concentrations, to capture helium that might otherwise be wasted. Advances in helium recycling technologies enable the recovery and reuse of helium, while regulatory efforts are increasingly directed at managing helium-containing natural gas emissions, emphasising the need to capture helium from vented gas. Additionally, there’s a focus on developing smaller, modular helium extraction facilities that can economically extract helium from lower-concentration sources, expanding sustainable production options.
The 2026 Gulf War created two distinct supply disruptions. The March 2026 Iranian strikes on Qatar's Ras Laffan complex structurally damaged LNG Trains 4 and 6, taking approximately 309 MMcf/year of downstream helium export capacity offline for 3-5 years (~4-5% of global supply). The subsequent US naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz immobilised the remaining 86% of Qatar's undamaged capacity for the duration of the blockade. The pre-crisis market was in structural oversupply, and new capacity from Russia, restarts from Algeria, and Qatar's own expansion programme more than compensates for the structural damage. The market faces a logistics crisis and a price dislocation, not a structural scarcity event.
No. LSC's analysis concludes that the helium market does not face a structural deficit. Known helium resources sustain over 260 years of production at current rates. New capacity additions in 2026 - Russia's Amur GPP Line 2 (700 MMcf/year), Qatar's NFE Helium-4 and Helium-5 (1,500 MMcf/year), and Algeria's Skikda restart - more than offset the structural damage from Qatar's Trains 4 and 6. The market faces elevated spot prices, contract repricing at re-opener windows, and a bifurcated Western/Russian-Asian supply chain. It does not face a resource exhaustion problem.
Exposure is inversely proportional to recycling rate. TSMC's existing 65-70% fleet-wide helium recovery rate provides the highest protection - its Arizona fabs draw on domestic US supply not subject to Gulf transit risk. Samsung faces the most material near-term exposure: it imports a significant share of its helium from Qatar and currently recovers only 19.1% of helium consumed. Samsung's March 2026 announcement of its Helium Recycling System (HeRS) (targeting >90% recovery) addresses this structurally but requires deployment time. SK Hynix (15-20% recovery) remains exposed until recycling infrastructure is deployed.
Investors and companies who would like to learn more about our research into the outlook for the Helium Industry can click on the link below for a FREE download of our research analysis.
Investor Readiness Tools
Professional tools for SME investor preparation. Financial analysis, due diligence, and presentation platforms to prepare for capital raising and institutional…
The Ultimate Guide to Sponsored Equity Research
The Ultimate Guide to Sponsored Equity Research: Benefits, Challenges, and How to Get Started
Gulf Analysis Series: Crisis, Disruption, and Realignment
A multi-report analytical series on the Strait of Hormuz, industrial gas and raw material supply chains, and the downstream petrochemical…
Anglo Teck: A Copper Powerhouse Emerges
Anglo–Teck A Copper Powerhouse Emerges From a Proposed Merger of Equals On 9 September 2025, Anglo American and Teck Resources…
Important Information
This report has been prepared and issued by Little Square Capital Limited (“LSC”), which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (registration number 942894). This is a marketing communication. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
This report is directed exclusively at Professional Investors and Eligible Counterparties as defined under UK FCA and MiFID II regulations. It is not directed at retail investors. Nothing in this report constitutes investment advice or a solicitation to invest in any security or financial instrument.
All information has been compiled from publicly available sources believed to be reliable. LSC does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of information contained herein. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
For full disclosures, see: littlesquarecapital.com/disclosures/